Jump to content
Electronics-Lab.com Community

EdwardM

Members
  • Content Count

    246
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

About EdwardM

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 09/08/1948
  1. Hi Dan doesn't sound too difficult, essentially it's just an alarm clock (4, 7 segment LED displays or LCD display plus some means of setting time and an alarm time). Thereafter it's just a dimmer circuit, fired from fully off to fully on for a programmable time (another 2 switches). I'm sure there are many on this forum who could design one, maybe even me, if and when I get the time. Nor should it be horribly expensive! (Take a look at the 'giveaway' clocks available and imagine the cost of adding dimming....zilch + zilch = Best Ed
  2. Hi don't know if it will help but I'd consider using 3 of the parallel port lines to clock 3, 4-bit serial/parallel converters, each of which would be attached to a motor driver chip. This will leave you a minimum of 5 parallel port lines available for your obstacle circuit (which could also be serialised in the other direction). The software requirements shouldn't be too onerous as the stepper motors require on/off times to be in the millisecond range whilst the parallel port is capable of considerably higher speeds. Ed Actually, you only need one parallel port line for serial data if the serial/parallel devices are cascaded, together with one clock line.
  3. Hi u from what I understand, a magnetic sensor actually senses current, therefore if your closed loop circuit is driven by a voltage then it should be possible to detect that current using a combination of X, Y and Z coils to determine an exact position, it depends also on how far away you expect to detect the wire, is it a few cm? or 30-40m? Hope that helps Ed You could also try a Google search on magnetic sensors
  4. Hi Imcondor welcome. As far as I remember the LM353 has been superseded by the lower power LF353, which is pin for pin compatible. Best of Luck Ed
  5. Hi Staigen don't think so... I shifted the input gradually from 2.5v to 5v and got a gradual change of output from 0v to 5v which was the original requirement, this led me to believe that my original equation might be correct. Do let us know why you think that it's not linear. As you rightly say, "when the input 2.5v the output saturate at 0v" It is a rail to rail opamp with a single supply of 5v so that's what I'd expect to happen. And, "When the input is 5volt, the output saturate at 5 volt" ... Yes, also. "And the scale between is not linear", please explain - there are no reactive components in the circuit which would cause this nonlinearity. Thanks for agreeing that the opamps I bought to prove the circuit seem to be excellent. Ed
  6. Hi wk I now realize I was being a bit lazy about the circuit I described, I used an online opamp calculator to provide the starting values but they aren't quite correct. What I have done is obtained some AD8601 rail-rail single supply opamps and did a quick build using a 500K pot as the feedback element and a 50K pot to derive the reference. The reference was set to about 4.75v and the feedback set (by eye) at about 1:1, and lo and behold it did work. Put in 2.5v and you get 0v out, put in 5v and you get 5v out. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to produce a graph to prove that the transfer function is linear, however, it should be and I leave it others who may have the time to carry it forward. Best of Luck Ed
  7. Hi Chaps R1 and R2 provide an offset voltage of about +2.5v (your minimum input), this means you need something more positive than that at the non-inverting input to make the output voltage rise above 0v. The value of all the resistors is almost immaterial provided that they maintain the same ratio. With a bit of good luck and a following wind, it ought to work. Best of Luck Ed PS If you are interested in the theory behind this, I'd suggest you read chapter 4 of OP AMPS for EVERYONE it's freely available on the web.
  8. Hi Staigen I know what you mean, this site is much more personal than any of the others... Seems to be often on monday evenings UK time that I can't reach E-lab, maybe Mixos doesn't get out of jail until tuesdays? ;D Ed
  9. Hi anybody here, + or - 0.5% usually means that range of inaccuracy of full scale, there is also a residual potential error of + or - 1 digit. Is that any clearer? Ed
  10. Hi wk with this sort of problem you have to start with the transfer function. In this case you are transferring an input of between 2.5 and 5v into an output of 0 to 5v and it should be linear, ie Vout = m*Vin+C. (The equation for a straight line). So m will equal the slope of the line (5-0)/(5-2.5) = 2 and C from the same formula = -5 after plugging-in the value of m. Vin Vo=2*Vin -5 2.5 0 3.0 1 3.5 2 4.0 3 4.5 4 5.0 5 You then need an Opamp circuit to achieve this transfer function: see attached .png It would be a good idea to use an Opamp designed for single supply, rail to rail use and values of R1 to R4 (to start experimenting) are 1K1, 1K, 9K, 10K. Hope I've got this right ??? Best of Luck Ed
  11. EdwardM

    caps

    Hi mettula Test for open circuit (which a capacitor should be) using high Ohms range, there may be an initial 'kick' of the meter display but it should become infinity. Test for short circuit, anything lower than infinity Ohms indicates leakage and the worst case being a short circuit (0 Ohms). Test for good: One way is to connect a battery or power supply to the capacitor via a high value resistor and at the same time measure the voltage across the capacitor. From a knowledge of the supply voltage and resistance of the resistor you can make a reasonably accurate guess at the capacitors value using the voltage rise time formula for a capacitor. Hope that helps Ed
  12. Hi Gogo you could do worse than start where I did, after reading lots of contradictory material I bought a book called Easy Step'n, it's not high tech but down to earth practical advice on the care and feeding of stepper motors and how to get started with them and I highly recommend it. Best of Luck Ed http://www.melabs.com/products/books/stbook.htm
  13. Hi Adam, the short answer is a qualified yes. 1000kSPS = 1MSPS = 1 million samples per second thus 1 sample per microsecond. Have a look at some ADC datasheets (Maxim, Analog Devices and others) to get some more detail. Best of Luck Ed
  14. One of the best resources on the net for the HD44780 is http://ouwehand.net/~peter/lcd/lcd.shtml Best of Luck Ed
  15. EdwardM

    DVM??

    Hi All you could start your websearch at Analog Devices http://www.analog.com/en/cat/0,2878,760,00.html Best of Luck Ed
×
×
  • Create New...